Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond Low-Rank: Low-Rank Sparse Prompting via Spiking Neural Network and Prompt Factorization

About

Visual Prompting (VP) has emerged as an efficient paradigm for adapting large-scale pre-trained vision models to downstream tasks by incorporating learnable prompts at the input level. However, existing VP methods typically employ dense pixel-level prompts, which often suffer from redundant perturbations, limited generalization and energy inefficiency. To overcome these limitations, we propose to integrate brain-inspired spiking learning into visual prompt learning tasks. As we know that spiking neuron can perform inexpensive information processing by transmitting the input data into discrete spike trains and return sparse outputs. Inspired by this, we propose \textbf{Lo}w-\textbf{R}ank visual \textbf{S}pike \textbf{P}rompting (LoRSP), a novel framework that learns dynamic low-rank sparse visual prompts naturally via a Spiking neuron learning mechanism. The core idea of LoRSP is to exploit the brain-inspired sparse firing mechanism of spiking neurons to generate pixel-level sparse prompt for each instance. To be specific, we first construct a series of prompt factors via low-rank factorization to capture distinct prompt subspaces. These prompt factors are then fed into an SNN architecture, which performs the integrate-and-fire process to emit spikes. As a result, our LoRSP generates a \emph{sparse} visual prompt while maintaining the low-rank constraint. This design enables instance-specific selective prompting, leading to more compact and robust adaptation across diverse downstream tasks. Extensive experiments on five heterogeneous vision backbones and multiple benchmarks demonstrate that LoRSP achieves competitive performance while requiring fewer tunable parameters compared to existing VP methods.

Yumiao Zhao, Bo Jiang, Beibei Wang, Xixi Wan, Xiao Wang, Jin Tang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10
Accuracy97.77
973
Image ClassificationTiny ImageNet (test)
Accuracy90.78
859
Image ClassificationImageNet V2--
767
Image ClassificationImageNet A
Top-1 Acc20.61
723
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 (test)--
429
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100
Accuracy88.69
375
Image ClassificationTiny-ImageNet
Accuracy (%)86.93
134
Image ClassificationImageNet-R
Accuracy32.86
29
Fine-grained Image ClassificationFlower102
Accuracy99.19
24
Fine-grained Image ClassificationOxford Pets--
20
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update