Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Flow-Transformed Implicit Processes for Function-Space Variational Inference

About

Implicit-process priors define distributions over functions through flexible generative mechanisms, making them attractive for Bayesian function-space modelling. However, performing posterior inference with such priors is challenging because their induced function-space distributions are typically not available in closed form. One practical strategy is to approximate the prior using a finite collection of sampled functions, and then represent posterior functions as learned combinations of these samples. Existing approaches commonly place a Gaussian variational distribution over the combination weights. While tractable, this choice limits the shapes of posterior uncertainty that can be represented, especially when the true posterior is asymmetric, heavy-tailed, or multimodal. We propose Flow-Transformed Implicit Processes (FTIP), a variational inference method that makes this finite-dimensional function-space approximation more expressive. Instead of using a Gaussian distribution over the combination weights, FTIP uses a normalizing flow to define a richer variational distribution. This induces a flexible posterior distribution over functions while preserving tractable optimization. We train the model using a Black-Box {\alpha} objective, allowing us to compare mass-covering and mode-seeking variational behaviour. Experiments show that FTIP captures asymmetric and multimodal posterior structure in function space that Gaussian coefficient approximations tend to smooth or collapse.

Luis A. Ortega, Andr\'es R. Masegosa, Thomas D. Nielsen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
RegressionUCI CONCRETE (test)
Neg Log Likelihood3.48
51
RegressionUCI POWER (test)
Negative Log Likelihood2.83
43
RegressionUCI NAVAL (test)
Negative Log Likelihood-4.232
42
RegressionUCI WINE (test)
Negative Log Likelihood0.95
38
RegressionBoston UCI (test)--
36
Binary ClassificationSUSY 5M instances (test)
Accuracy80.1
5
Binary ClassificationHIGGS 11M instances (test)
Accuracy66.75
5
RegressionYearPredictionMSD (test)
RMSE10.31
5
Multiclass ClassificationCIFAR10
Error Rate33.5
2
Multiclass ClassificationFashionMNIST
Error Rate9.4
2
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update