Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Edge-aware Decoding for Neural Asymmetric Routing

About

Neural asymmetric routing models increasingly encode directionality through matrix representations and asymmetry-aware attention. The final routing action, however, is not a node in isolation but a directed transition chosen under the current partial route. This creates a representation--decision mismatch: pairwise cost information may be encoded upstream while the final candidate logit is still largely parameterized as context--node compatibility. We propose a decoder-design principle for neural asymmetric routing: the final score should explicitly expose transition-level quantities suggested by the problem's cost-to-go structure. We instantiate this principle with an edge-aware decoder that adds candidate-specific terms for the current directed edge, return-to-start closure, and static lightweight lookahead, while keeping the representation backbone fixed. On a controlled SVD/Sinkhorn asymmetric backbone, the decoder improves over the RADAR reference when trained on ATSP-100 and evaluated zero-shot on ATSP-100/200/500/1000, reducing the ATSP-1000 gap from $4.13\%$ to $2.73\%$. On ACVRP, the same score-level modification shows the same qualitative trend under a richer routing state. ATSP ablations and directed-transition diagnostics sharpen the mechanism: the strongest evidence concerns sensitivity to the current directed edge, while closure and static lookahead act as heuristic continuation cues. The results support a mechanism study: a key decoder-side signal in neural asymmetric routing is decision-time exposure of transition-level edge information.

Li Liang, Jinbiao Chen, Zizhen Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Asymmetric Traveling Salesperson ProblemATSP N=100 (test)
Optimality Gap0.63
34
Asymmetric Capacitated Vehicle Routing ProblemACVRP1000 generalization
Objective Value2.1148
21
Asymmetric Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (ACVRP)ACVRP100 (test 1k instances)
Objective Value2.1444
11
Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem (ATSP)ATSP1000 Generalization (1k instances)
Objective Value1.617
11
Showing 4 of 4 rows

Other info

Follow for update