Why Not Hyperparameter-Friendly Optimisation? A Monotonic Adaptive Norm Rescaling Approach For Long-Tailed Recognition
About
Long-tailed recognition poses a significant challenge for deep learning. The two-stage decoupling paradigm, which separates representation learning from classifier retraining, offers a promising solution. During the classifier retraining stage, adaptive norm rescaling is a popular technique. It adjusts the per-class weight norms via parameter regularization, which inevitably introduces hyperparameters. However, many studies report that long-tailed recognition is sensitive to these hyperparameters, as their setup significantly impacts performance. In this paper, we first provide a class-conditional distribution perspective to support norm rescaling methods. Furthermore, we propose a simple but effective approach called Self-Adaptive Monotonic Normalization (SAMN). SAMN avoids the need for parameter regularization. It directly enforces monotonicity on per-class weight norms using the Pool Adjacent Violators Algorithm, making the method hyperparameter-friendly. SAMN is a universal strategy that integrates seamlessly with other methods for enhanced performance. Experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method significantly boosts long-tailed recognition performance, often achieving state-of-the-art results.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT IF 50 (test) | Top-1 Acc91.3 | 39 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | ImageNet LT | Accuracy (Many)69.7 | 37 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 IF=10 long-tail (test) | Top-1 Accuracy74.1 | 36 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 (IF=50) long-tail (test) | Top-1 Acc64 | 35 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | CIFAR-100 long-tailed (IF=100) (test) | Top-1 Accuracy57.7 | 26 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | CIFAR-10-LT IF 100 (test) | Top-1 Accuracy88.5 | 20 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR10 Long-Tailed IF=10 (test) | Accuracy95.2 | 13 | |
| Long-Tailed Image Classification | iNaturalist 2018 | Overall Accuracy72.7 | 10 |