Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Message Tuning Outshines Graph Prompt Tuning: A Prismatic Space Perspective

About

Graph Foundation Models (GFMs), built upon the Pre-training and Adaptation paradigm, have emerged as a research hotspot in graph learning. For GNN-based GFMs, graph prompt tuning has become the prevailing adaptation method for downstream tasks. Although recent methods explain why graph prompt tuning works, how to rigorously measure its adaptation capacity remains an open problem. Addressing this problem is critical for understanding the capability limits of graph prompt tuning and for developing more powerful adaptation methods. In this paper, we propose Prismatic Space Theory (PS-Theory), a novel mathematical framework to quantify the capacity of adaptation methods, while focusing on establishing the upper bound for the adaptation capacity of graph prompt tuning. Building upon the proposed PS-Theory, we further introduce Message Tuning for GFMs (MTG), a lightweight approach that injects a small set of learnable message prototypes into each layer of the GNN backbone to adaptively guide message fusion without updating pre-trained weights. Through our PS-Theory, we prove that the adaptation capacity of MTG can exceed the theoretical upper bound of graph prompt tuning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MTG consistently outperforms graph prompt baselines across diverse benchmark datasets, providing strong empirical support for our theoretical findings.

Yancheng Chen, Dun Ma, Shuai Zhang, Yang Liu, Xixun Lin, Xiangyu Zhao, Wenguo Yang, Wei Chen, Chuan Zhou• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Graph ClassificationPROTEINS
Accuracy66.98
1383
Graph ClassificationMUTAG
Accuracy75.8
1229
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy83.32
898
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.7913
859
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy58.54
609
Node ClassificationActor
Accuracy29.44
598
Graph ClassificationCOLLAB
Accuracy52.25
532
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy50.7
501
Graph ClassificationIMDB-B
Accuracy62.25
455
Graph ClassificationENZYMES
Accuracy26.08
419
Showing 10 of 50 rows

Other info

Follow for update