Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

See Less, Specify More: Visual Evidence Budgets for Generalizable VLAs

About

Generalization remains a central bottleneck for vision-language-action (VLA) models: under distractors, appearance shifts, and semantically similar tasks, the policy must often infer local execution details from coarse instructions while also deciding which parts of the image matter for control. We present S2 (See Less, Specify More), a framework for improving VLA generalization by training the executor under a cleaner interface. Specify More preserves the original instruction as a stable high-level goal while relabeling each trajectory into refined trajectory- and subtask-level language that disambiguates the current execution mode. Unlike native attention, See Less imposes an explicit visual evidence budget, training the executor to act from task-sufficient evidence rather than unconstrained visual context, without any region or mask annotation. This interface lets the executor follow detailed guidance without relying on distracting visual patches or resolving avoidable ambiguity on its own, and it remains compatible with off-the-shelf VLM planners through in-context learning. Across our main evaluation settings, S2 improves overall generalization metrics by changing the executor's learning problem: coarse instructions induce avoidable supervision aliasing, goal-preserving local guidance outperforms instruction replacement in our main ablations, and explicit evidence budgeting reduces dependence on broad visual context beyond efficiency considerations. Across eight real-robot tasks on TX-G2 (an AgiBot G2-compatible variant) and HSR, S2 raises mean subtask success from 54.2% to 79.0% over pi0.5. Together, these results suggest that VLA generalization improves when the executor is trained to act from informative local guidance and task-sufficient visual evidence, rather than recovering both from weak supervision.

Yueh-Hua Wu, Tatsuya Matsushima, Kei Ota• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Long-horizon language-conditioned manipulationCalvin ABC->D
Average Sequence Length3.95
18
Robot ManipulationTX-G2
Cutlery Subtask Success Rate15
8
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO-10
Object Success70
6
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Goal
Object Completion Score92
6
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Object
Object Success Rate95.5
6
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO Spatial
Object Success Rate99
6
Bottles task (bottle transport)HSR
Subtask Success87.5
4
Bowl manipulationTX-G2 real-robot
Subtask Success67.5
4
Box task (box transport)HSR
Subtask Success Rate91.7
4
Coffee task (navigation and manipulation)HSR
Subtask Success Rate100
4
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update