Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Exploring Cross-Scenario Generality of Agentic Memory Systems: Diagnostics and a Strong Baseline

About

LLM agents accumulate histories that outgrow their context windows, motivating a growing literature on memory systems. Yet most existing designs are tuned to a single scenario (multi-session chat or a single trajectory format), and there is little evidence that they generalize across the heterogeneous trajectories agents encounter in deployment. We revisit eight memory systems plus an agentic harness for search problems, on five scenarios: single-turn QA, multi-session chat, agentic-trajectory QA, memory stress tests, and long-horizon agentic tasks. The harness, which self-manages flat text-file storage via tool calls, achieves the best cross-task ranking, suggesting that memory performance hinges on giving the agent active control over storage and retrieval rather than on a passive store behind a fixed pipeline. We instantiate this insight in AutoMEM, an agentic memory harness with a self-managed tool interface that achieves the best cross-scenario generality among the systems we evaluate.

Zhikai Chen, Jialiang Gu, Junyu Yin, Xianxuan Long, Shenglai Zeng, Xiaoze Liu, Kai Guo, Keren Zhou, Jiliang Tang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Embodied Task CompletionAlfWorld--
106
Interactive agentic task completionMemoryArena--
14
Agentic Memory RetrievalMemoryAgentBench--
10
Agentic Question AnsweringAMABench--
10
Long-context Question AnsweringLocomo--
10
Agentic Trajectory Question AnsweringLocomo
Accuracy67.3
5
Agentic Trajectory Question AnsweringBenchmarks 12 task columns
Average Rank3.1
5
Question AnsweringLocomo
Build Cost5.50e+3
5
Question AnsweringHotpotQA
Build Cost (Tokens)600
5
Question AnsweringAMABench
Build Cost (tokens)2.08e+4
5
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update