Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

PENet+: A Lightweight Residual Transformer Framework for Efficient Image Steganalysis

About

Image steganalysis, the detection of hidden information embedded in digital images, is a core component of modern cybersecurity and digital forensics. Recent residual Transformer architectures, such as the Pixel-Difference-Convolution and Enhanced-Transformer-Network (PENet) [1], achieve strong detection accuracy, but their computational and memory demands hinder deployment in resource-constrained settings. We present PENet+, a lightweight steganalysis framework that preserves PENet's discriminative structure while substantially improving efficiency. Rather than redesigning or compressing the attention blocks, we retain PENet's self-attention topology for reproducibility and add a classifier-streamlining stage that progressively narrows the SPP-to-FC1 input channels (SPP: spatial pyramid pooling; FC1: first fully connected layer), yielding large reductions in parameters and FLOPs with negligible accuracy loss. We further refine the high-pass-filter (HPF) stem with an activation-aware mechanism that aggregates HPF responses early and selects a balanced SRM-Gabor top-K subset, and we replace PENet's backbone with a MobileNetV2-style inverted residual network. A balanced configuration with K=31 filters (16 Gabor + 15 SRM) matches or surpasses heavier settings at lower compute. Finally, we motivate PReLU from a steganalysis standpoint, arguing that preserving negative responses helps capture weak stego cues that ReLU suppresses. On a disjoint ALASKA2 JPEG QF90 protocol at 512x512 resolution (5,000 cover images for training, validation, and internal testing; a separate 19,000-cover evaluation set), PENet+ achieves up to 45.5% fewer parameters and about 97% fewer FLOPs than the re-evaluated PENet baseline, offering a computationally efficient direction for resource-constrained steganalysis. Device-level latency and power measurements remain future work.

Jincheol AN, Dongsu Kim, Haneol Jang, YoungJoon Yoo• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 nsF5 (test)
Accuracy (0.2 bpc)79.14
13
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 (J-UNIWARD) (test)
Accuracy (0.2 bpc)84.72
13
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 UERD (test)
Accuracy (0.2 bpc)79.68
13
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 (nsF5 @ 0.4 bpc)
Accuracy94.54
7
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 (UERD @ 0.4 bpc)
Accuracy88.86
7
SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 256x256 nsF5 (0.2 bpc)
Accuracy68.59
4
SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 256x256 J-UNIWARD 0.2 bpc
Accuracy76.31
4
SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 256x256 J-UNIWARD 0.4 bpc
Accuracy86.29
4
SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 256x256 (UERD) 0.2 bpc
Accuracy73.35
4
Image SteganalysisALASKA2 QF90 (J-UNIWARD @ 0.4 bpc)
Accuracy91.97
3
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update