MoCA-Agent: A Market-of-Claims Code Agent for Financial and Numerical Reasoning
About
Financial and tabular question answering requires more than fluent reasoning: answers must be grounded in the exact facts, formulas, units, signs, and scales that support them. A single misread cell or incorrect operation can silently produce a plausible but wrong result. We introduce \textsc{MOCA-Agent}, a market-of-claims code agent that replaces free-form multi-agent debate with claim-level verification. The system decomposes each question into typed atomic claims, asks specialist trader agents to buy or sell those claims, clears their orders into confidence-weighted accept/reject decisions, and synthesizes an executable Python program from market-supported evidence. A code-aware verifier then checks the program for execution, structural consistency, and common financial reasoning errors, with at most one market-aware repair round. Across ten public benchmarks spanning financial numerical reasoning, general tabular reasoning, ESG question answering, and multimodal chart reasoning, \textsc{MOCA-Agent} achieves strong performance using a fixed Qwen3.6-27B backbone, including $78.3\%$ on FinQA, $76.0\%$ on FinanceMath, $71.2\%$ on MultiHiertt, $86.9\%$ on ESGenius, and $85.6\%$ average on FinChart-Bench. These results show that aggregating evidence at the level of atomic claims, rather than whole answers, improves robustness in high-stakes numerical reasoning.\footnote{The code and data are available: https://github.com/UBC-NLP/MoCA-Agent.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | TabMWP | Accuracy96 | 210 | |
| Financial Reasoning | DM-Complong | Accuracy50.67 | 46 | |
| Tabular Analysis | WTQ | Accuracy81.4 | 39 | |
| Question Answering | ESGenius | Accuracy86.88 | 38 | |
| Table Mathematical Reasoning | TabMWP (test) | Accuracy96 | 35 | |
| Financial Reasoning | DM-Simplong | Accuracy70 | 32 | |
| Financial Numerical Reasoning | FinQA (test) | Execution Accuracy78.29 | 27 | |
| Table Question Answering | WikiTableQuestions (WTQ) (test) | Accuracy81.4 | 26 | |
| Chart Understanding | FinChart-Bench | TF Score97.27 | 26 | |
| Multimodal Chart Reasoning | FinChart (official split) | TF Score97.27 | 18 |