Keep Policy Gradient in Charge: Sibling-Guided Credit Distillation for Long-Horizon Tool-Use Agents
About
Long-horizon tool-use reinforcement learning learns from outcome verification, but trajectory-level advantages are broadcast over reasoning, API, and answer tokens. Direct self-distillation can supply a denser signal, but in our experiments it can also destroy tool use by rehearsing teacher behavior without identifying which actions the verifier rewards. We introduce Sibling-Guided Credit Distillation (SGCD), which uses distillation for bounded credit weighting rather than as a competing actor loss. Dynamic sampling produces mixed successful and failed sibling rollouts; an external LLM summarizes their contrast into a training-only credit reference; and detached teacher/student divergence reshapes GRPO token advantages. The deployed student receives only the clean task prompt. Across AppWorld and tau^3-airline, SGCD reports higher held-out point estimates than GRPO-family comparators: AppWorld TGC improves from 42.9 to 45.6 on test_normal and from 24.7 to 27.0 on test_challenge, and tau^3-airline held-out evaluator score improves from 0.583 to 0.602. These results support a narrow design rule for long-horizon tool-use agents: use distillation to guide credit assignment while keeping policy gradient in charge of the actor update.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tool Calling | AppWorld (test-normal) | Task Goal Completion (TGC)45.6 | 11 | |
| Multi-turn tool-use | τ³-airline 20-task (held-out) | Pass@160.2 | 4 | |
| Multi-turn tool-use | AppWorld (test challenge) | Task Goal Completion (TGC)27 | 3 |