GRIP: Feedback-Guided Prompt Retrieval for Large Multimodal Models
About
In-Context Learning (ICL) has become a powerful mechanism for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to new tasks without fine-tuning. Extending this concept to Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), Multimodal In-Context Learning (M-ICL) relies on retrieving relevant examples, such as images, captions, or question-answer pairs, to guide predictions across tasks like classification, captioning, and visual question answering (VQA). Most existing approaches select in-context examples based on feature-space similarity, assuming that semantically similar samples provide the most useful context. However, our systematic analysis reveals that this assumption does not always hold: visually similar examples are not necessarily those that most effectively enhance in-context learning performance. To address this, we propose the Guided Retrieval of In-context Prompts (GRIP), a learnable vision-only retrieval framework that leverages feedback from LMMs to identify examples that truly improve model predictions. GRIP learns to distinguish beneficial from detrimental in-context examples through contrastive training, refining retrieval beyond pure similarity. Across three multimodal tasks, namely classification, captioning, and VQA, GRIP improves consistently over similarity-based retrieval on Qwen2.5-VL-7B, with its strongest gains in classification on Idefics2-8B. Moreover, we demonstrate that retrievers trained with feedback from one open LMM can be transferred to other models without retraining, including closed-source GPT-4o and Gemini, enabling scalable and cost-efficient deployment of M-ICL. Code will be published upon acceptance.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | DTD (Describable Textures Dataset) | Accuracy61.3 | 90 | |
| Visual Question Answering | ScienceVQA | Acc84.7 | 37 | |
| Visual Question Answering | SEED-Bench | Accuracy71.4 | 32 | |
| Image Classification | UC Merced | Overall Accuracy (OA %)85.2 | 24 | |
| Image Captioning | MS-COCO | CIDEr79.9 | 16 | |
| Image Classification | Oxford-IIIT Pet Dataset | Accuracy88.5 | 10 | |
| Visual Question Answering | ScienceVQA (test) | Accuracy85.9 | 8 | |
| Multimodal Reasoning | SEED | Accuracy (SEED)44.2 | 4 |