Stop When Further Reasoning Won't Help: Attention-State Adaptive Generation in Reasoning Models
About
By incorporating test-time compute scaling, large reasoning models (LRMs) can solve complex problems through explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning processes. However, they often suffer from overthinking, resulting in redundant token outputs and degraded accuracy. Current methods to mitigate this issue remain limited: training-based approaches require substantial computational resources, while training-free methods rely on well-crafted prompts or unreliable confidence signals. In this work, we investigate early stopping from the perspective of attention distributions and propose a simple method, ASAG, which infers the model's reasoning state and adaptively adjusts the generation strategy. The proposed framework is training-free and plug-and-play, enabling seamless integration into existing LRMs. Extensive experiments on nine benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements across mainstream LRMs with varying parameter scales, including the DeepSeek-R1-Distill and Qwen3 series. Specifically, ASAG improves average accuracy by 3.2% while reducing the number of generated tokens by nearly 40% across all reasoning tasks on Qwen3-8B.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Reasoning | MATH 500 | Accuracy (Acc)95 | 600 | |
| Code Reasoning | LiveCodeBench | Accuracy75.3 | 102 | |
| Mathematical & Scientific Reasoning | AVG GSM8K MATH-500 AIME 2024 OlympiadBench GPQA Diamond | Accuracy78.4 | 24 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | GSM8K | Accuracy96.2 | 24 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | OlympiadBench | Accuracy64.6 | 24 | |
| Scientific Reasoning | GPQA Diamond | Accuracy63.1 | 24 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AIME 2024 | Accuracy73.3 | 24 | |
| Coding Reasoning | HumanEval | Accuracy (%)93.9 | 16 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | AMC 2023 | Accuracy97.5 | 12 | |
| Reasoning | AVG AMC 2023, AIME 2025, HumanEval, LiveCodeBench | Accuracy83.4 | 12 |