Ling and Ring 2.6 Technical Report: Efficient and Instant Agentic Intelligence at Trillion-Parameter Scale
About
Efficient and scalable agentic intelligence requires models that can deliver both low-latency responses and strong reasoning capabilities while remaining practical to train, serve, and deploy. In this report, we present Ling-2.6 and Ring-2.6, a family of models designed to address this challenge at scale. Ling-2.6 is optimized for instant response generation and high capability per output token, whereas Ring-2.6 is tailored for deeper reasoning and more advanced agentic workflows. Instead of training from scratch, we upgrade the Ling-2.0 base model through architectural migration pre-training and large-scale post-training. This upgrade is guided by a unified co-design of model architecture, optimization objectives, serving systems, and agent training environments, enabling improvements in both model capability and deployment efficiency. At the architectural level, we introduce a hybrid linear attention design that integrates Lightning Attention with MLA, improving the efficiency of long-context training and decoding. To further enhance token efficiency, we optimize capability per output token through Evolutionary Chain-of-Thought, Linguistic Unit Policy Optimization, bidirectional preference alignment, and shortest-correct-response distillation. For agentic capabilities, we propose KPop, a reinforcement learning framework designed to support stable training of Ring-2.6-1T on large-scale environment-grounded data. KPop improves training efficiency through asynchronous scheduling across coding, search, tool use, and workflow execution, enabling scalable learning from complex agent-environment interactions. Together, Ling-2.6 and Ring-2.6 provide a practical pathway toward efficient, scalable, and open agentic systems. We open-source all checkpoints in the 2.6 family to support further research and development in practical agentic intelligence.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-context Understanding | LongBench v2 | Overall Score48.31 | 185 | |
| Agentic Coding | SWE-bench Verified | Percentage Resolved74 | 71 | |
| Instruction Following | IFBench | IFBench Score57.62 | 68 | |
| Knowledge | GPQA Diamond | Accuracy (GPQA Knowledge)76.17 | 49 | |
| Reasoning | LiveCodeBench v6 | Score65.58 | 28 | |
| Abstract Reasoning | ARC-AGI 2 | Pass@266.18 | 24 | |
| Instruction Following | IFBench | IFBench Score57.4 | 23 | |
| Agentic | τ2-bench | Score78.36 | 20 | |
| Reasoning & General | IMO-AnswerBench | Score65.81 | 19 | |
| Agentic | BFCL v4 | pass@170.64 | 16 |