Cascaded Sparse Autoencoders Learn Multi-Level Visual Concepts in Multimodal LLMs
About
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on vision-language tasks, yet their internal visual representations remain difficult to interpret. Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) provide a scalable way to decompose dense model activations into sparse, interpretable features. However, existing SAE architectures primarily recover flat feature dictionaries and are less suited for explicit multi-level concept organization. In this paper, we introduce cascaded sparse autoencoders (CSAEs) for learning hierarchical visual concepts in MLLMs. Rather than nesting or stacking SAE sparse activation codes, CSAEs train a second-level SAE directly on the decoder weights of the first-level SAE, treating learned low-level feature directions as inputs for higher-level abstraction. This design enables CSAEs to learn "concepts of concepts" while avoiding drawbacks from the shared-prefix coupling of nesting, Matryoshka-style hierarchies and the bottlenecks of naively stacked SAEs. Experiments across Qwen3-VL, Gemma-3, and LLaVA on multiple visual datasets show that CSAEs improve interpretability in terms of hierarchical concept coherence over state-of-the-art SAE baselines. Results on concept steering further demonstrate that the learned concept groups support effective group-level interventions in MLLM outputs.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-level Semantic Coherence Evaluation | Color | HMSmean99.3 | 27 | |
| Multi-level Semantic Coherence Evaluation | ImageNet | HMSmean0.896 | 27 | |
| Multi-level Semantic Coherence Evaluation | COCO | HMSmean98 | 27 | |
| Multi-level Semantic Coherence Evaluation | iNaturalist | HMSmean91.3 | 27 | |
| Semantic Coherence Evaluation | ImageNet | HMS_med1 | 27 | |
| Semantic Coherence Evaluation | COCO | HMS_med1 | 27 | |
| Semantic Coherence Evaluation | iNaturalist | HMS_med98.7 | 27 | |
| Semantic Coherence Evaluation | Color | HMS_med99.9 | 27 | |
| Concept Insertion | COCO (test) | Appearance Rate (%)67.8 | 5 | |
| Concept Suppression | COCO (test) | Concepts Removed (%)40.5 | 5 |