Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Graph Neural Networks for Semi-Supervised Image Classification with Multi-Feature Aggregation

About

Feature extraction involves the identification and extraction of salient characteristics or patterns, including edges, textures, shapes, and color attributes. Contemporary feature extractors predominantly leverage deep learning architectures, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (VITs). The availability of diverse feature extractors in the literature provides a wide range of feature representations. Features extracted from an image depend on the specific application, the chosen extractor, and its configuration. Therefore, integrating complementary information by combining distinct extractors offers a promising way to enhance performance. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), particularly Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs), have emerged as powerful and widely adopted approaches for semi-supervised image classification, as they effectively leverage both labeled and unlabeled data while exploiting the underlying graph structures that capture relationships among samples. This study proposes a novel approach for GNNs in scenarios where labeled data is scarce, by integrating diverse sets of feature and graph representations derived from various extractors in classification scenarios. Experimental investigations were conducted, encompassing combinations of distinct feature and graph extractors, as well as rank aggregation strategies. The primary contributions of this work are underscored by the experimental findings, which demonstrate that the strategic combination of feature and graph representations, coupled with the application of manifold learning for graph processing, leads to significant improvements in classification accuracy across the majority of experimental conditions. Furthermore, the utilization of rank aggregation techniques to integrate features from different extractors was shown to enhance classification accuracy.

Marina Chagas Bulach Gapski, Vinicius Atsushi Sato Kawai, Gustavo Rosseto Leticio, Lucas Pascotti Valem, Daniel Carlos Guimar\~aes Pedronette, Mohand Said Allili• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semi-supervised Image ClassificationCorel5k (test)
Accuracy98.53
6
Semi-supervised Image ClassificationFlowers (test)
Accuracy99.73
5
Semi-supervised Image ClassificationCUB200 (test)
Accuracy (%)82.25
5
Image ClassificationFlowers
Accuracy99.85
2
Image ClassificationCorel5k
Accuracy98.52
2
Image ClassificationCUB200-2011
Accuracy83.33
2
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update