Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Models

About

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has become a standard paradigm for enhancing the capability of large reasoning models. RLVR typically samples responses independently and optimizes the policy using from final answers. This paradigm has two limitations. First, independently responses often contain similar intermediate reasoning steps, causing redundant exploration and wasted computation. Second, sparse final-answer rewards make it hard to identify useful steps. Tree-based methods partly address this problem by sharing prefixes and comparing branches from the same prefix to provide fine-grained signals. However, tree branches are still expanded independently. When different branches reach similar reasoning states, they cannot share information and repeat similar exploration. Moreover, tree-based methods ignore such dispersion and only perform local comparisons within separate branches, which can lead to higher variance in advantage estimation. To address this challenge, we propose GraphPO (Graph-based Policy Optimization), a novel RL framework that represents rollouts as a directed acyclic graph, with reasoning steps as edges and semantic states summarized from the reasoning paths as nodes. GraphPO merges semantically equivalent reasoning paths into equivalence classes, allowing them to share suffixes and reallocating budget away from redundant expansions to diverse exploration. Furthermore, we assign efficiency advantages to incoming edges and correctness advantages to outgoing edges, thereby improving inference efficiency while deriving process supervision from outcome. Theory shows that GraphPO reduces advantage-estimation variance and enhances reasoning efficiency. Experiments on three LLMs across reasoning and agentic search benchmarks show that GraphPO consistently outperforms chain- and tree-based baselines with the same token budgets or response budgets.

Yuliang Zhan, Xinyu Tang, Jian Li, Dandan Zheng, Weilong Chai, Jingdong Chen, Jun Zhou, Ge Wu, Wenyue Tang, Hao Sun• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
ReasoningLiveCodeBench
pass@1 Accuracy48.3
71
Mathematical ReasoningAIME24
Accuracy66.2
70
Mathematical ReasoningAIME25
Accuracy54.7
27
Agentic SearchBrowsecomp
Score3.7
19
web-agent QAWebWalkerQA
F1 (Easy)11.5
13
Agentic Searchxbench
Online Deployment Accuracy13.1
9
Agentic SearchGeneral AI Assistant
Score (Lv.1)20.1
5
Agentic SearchCombined General AI Assistant, WebWalkerQA, BrowseComp, XBench
Overall Score11.8
5
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update