Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond Templates: Revisiting Zero-Shot Remote Sensing through Meta-Prompting

About

Vision-language models (VLMs) have sparked growing interest in zero-shot Earth Observation (EO) downstream tasks, with further gains enabled by remote-sensing-adapted models. We examine this setting across 17 VLM variants and 12 remote sensing (RS) datasets under Meta-Prompting for Visual Recognition (MPVR), and show that zero-shot performance remains highly sensitive to textual design choices, from the meta-prompts used to guide the LLM in generating class descriptions to the descriptions themselves. We explore why semantically rich LLM-generated class descriptions do not translate into consistent gains over simple domain-adapted CLIP-style descriptions. While LLM descriptions are more semantically expressive, they can also introduce noise in the text embedding space, reducing robustness in downstream tasks. We support this observation through a text log-likelihood analysis in the whitened CLIP feature space, comparing LLM-generated and template-based descriptions. Building on this finding, we study query embedding calibration and show that lightweight calibration of the query space consistently yields strong improvements in zero-shot classification and retrieval. Overall, our results provide practical insight into the trade-off between semantic richness and robustness, and identify embedding calibration as a simple and effective tool for improving zero-shot remote sensing performance.

Eirini Baltzi, Dionysis Christopoulos, Sotiris Spanos, Valsamis Ntouskos, Konstantinos Karantzalos• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationRESISC45
Accuracy75.4
539
Image ClassificationWHU-RS19
Accuracy95.3
104
Image ClassificationAID
Accuracy91.5
83
ClassificationEuroSAT
Accuracy69.9
75
Image ClassificationPatternNet
Accuracy82.8
65
Remote Sensing ClassificationSIRI-WHU
Top-1 Acc72.6
62
Image ClassificationRSI-CB128
Accuracy48.5
60
Image ClassificationRSI-CB256
Accuracy55.7
60
Image ClassificationMLRSNet
Accuracy70.7
60
Image ClassificationRSC11
Accuracy78.1
60
Showing 10 of 15 rows

Other info

Follow for update