Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Beyond the Next Step: Variable-Length Latent World Models for Long-Horizon Planning

About

Recently, world models have emerged as a promising paradigm for building intelligent agents by learning predictive models that estimate future environment states conditioned on observations and actions. In particular, JEPA-style latent world models provide an efficient alternative to pixel space prediction by learning action-conditioned dynamics in compact representation spaces. However, existing latent world models typically rely on one-step prediction and must be recursively rolled out for long-horizon planning, which leads to compounding errors and a mismatch between training objectives and downstream planning tasks. To address this limitation, we propose Variable-length Latent World Models (VLWMs), a framework that learns to predict future latent states conditioned on action sequences of variable lengths. Instead of training only on one-step transitions, VLWMs directly model temporally extended dynamics, allowing the same predictor to evaluate action plans over different horizons. We further introduce a curriculum training strategy that progressively expands the action horizon, stabilizing optimization from short-range dynamics to long-range prediction. At test time, we design planning methods tailored to VLWMs to better exploit their variable-length predictive capabilities. Experiments on long-horizon control tasks show that VLWMs significantly improve latent space world models, achieving 13\% average improvement over the state-of-the-art LeWM across different datasets, with especially large gains on tasks requiring extended planning. These results suggest that VLWM provides a simple yet effective paradigm for improving long-horizon prediction and planning in latent world models.

Tianqi Du, Qi Zhang, Yifei Wang, Yisen Wang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Goal-reaching PlanningPushT Long-Horizon (50 steps)
Success Rate60
16
Goal-conditioned PlanningPushT offset 25
Success Rate94
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningPushT offset 75
Success Rate20
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningPushT offset 100
Success Rate12
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningOGBench-Cube offset 50
Success Rate54
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningOGBench-Cube offset 75
Success Rate54
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningOGBench-Cube offset 100
Success Rate50
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningTwoRoom offset 25
Success Rate96
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningTwoRoom offset 50
Success Rate80
6
Goal-conditioned PlanningTwoRoom offset 75
Success Rate70
6
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update