Causal Gaussian Processes for Robust Treatment Effect Evaluation with Unobserved Confounding
About
The presence of confounding bias poses a key challenge in policy evaluation, as the target causal effects of actions are not identifiable (i.e., underdetermined) from observational data. On the other hand, existing confounding-robust evaluation strategies require detailed prior knowledge about the environment or apply only to discrete treatments and outcomes. This paper investigates causal effect evaluation over the continuous domain from confounded observations, while requiring only basic temporal ordering between the treatment and the outcome. We introduce a universal discretization of the exogenous domains that approximates the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with arbitrary accuracy using a finite number of latent states. Building on this newfound universal approximation property, we develop a novel family of Causal Gaussian process (CGP) models that effectively approximate the observational and interventional distributions of any causal model with confounded observations.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Causal Inference | Simulation Polynomial Function | NLPL370.8 | 2 | |
| Causal Inference | Simulation Logistic Function | Negative Log Predictive Likelihood204.8 | 2 | |
| Causal Inference | Simulation Phase Function | NLPL176.9 | 2 | |
| Causal Inference | Simulation Linear Function | Negative Log Predictive Likelihood463.5 | 2 | |
| Causal Inference | International Stroke Trial (IST) | Negative Log Predictive Likelihood34.0688 | 2 |