Selective Ensemble Based on Preference-Directed Multi-Objective Bandits
About
Selective ensemble for modern machine learning systems requires choosing promising model candidates under limited evaluation budgets, while downstream tasks often specify only partial preferences over capabilities such as accuracy, robustness, and reasoning. This setting naturally gives rise to a sequential decision problem under partially specified linear preferences. We formalize it as preference-directed multi-objective bandits (PDMOB), where admissible trade-offs are represented by a polyhedral preference cone. Based on this formulation, we introduce Pareto $C$-optimality, which recovers standard Pareto optimality and single-weight scalarization as special cases. We then propose the preference-directed upper confidence bound (PrefUCB) algorithm, which maintains directional confidence intervals to guide exploration. We analyze both indicator-based and gap-weighted regret, and establish instance-dependent logarithmic bounds for both criteria, recovering the optimal logarithmic dependence on the horizon $T$ in classical special cases. Experiments on large pre-trained model selective ensemble tasks and online asset allocation under institutional mandates validate the efficacy of our method.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Selection | Open LLM Leaderboard Customer Service scenario K = 42 models | Main Objective62.5 | 4 | |
| LLM Selection | Open LLM Leaderboard Legal Document Review scenario K = 42 models | Main Objective Success Rate69.9 | 4 | |
| LLM Selection | Open LLM Leaderboard High-frequency Trade scenario | Main Objective Score80.4 | 4 | |
| LLM Selection | Open LLM Leaderboard Scientific Discovery scenario K = 42 models | Main Objective64 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Aggressive Growth scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret0.142 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Market Neutral Hedge scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret0.28 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Income Focused scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret0.867 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Low Volatility scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret0.79 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Momentum Concentrated scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret5.9 | 4 | |
| Online Asset Allocation | NYSE(O) Risk Parity Enhanced scenario T = 5,651 days (test) | Averaged Gap-Weighted Regret0.818 | 4 |