Robot Critics that Sweat the Small Stuff
About
Large vision-language models contain several priors about the world and object interactions, making them useful critics during inference to steer robot policies towards success. However, closed-loop robot manipulation requires judging small visual differences between success and failure, which remains a challenge for current VLMs. We introduce a method to fine-tune critics by constructing pairwise progress supervision using success and failure rollouts obtained from a policy. Our fine-tuned critic excels at fine-grained progress reasoning and subtle failure detection, outperforming prior progress reasoning baselines. Additionally, we use an action-conditioned video model to predict the visual effect of several candidate actions sampled from a policy, and show that our critic can correctly identify successful candidates to execute, improving the average policy success rate by 11% across real-world tasks and 5.9% across simulation tasks.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stacking | Real-world | Success Rate32 | 11 | |
| Critic Accuracy | RoboCasa Overall v1 | Cab Countr Accuracy96.6 | 7 | |
| Critic Accuracy | LBM dataset | BimanBike Accuracy98 | 4 | |
| Critic Accuracy | RoboCasa OOD Only v1 | Countr Cab Accuracy97 | 3 | |
| PickPlace Lego To Bowl | Real-world | Success Rate8 | 2 | |
| Pickup Lego | Real-world | Success Rate16 | 2 | |
| Push-Bowl | Real-world | mIoU32.1 | 2 | |
| Robotic Manipulation | RoboCasa365 simulation atomic tasks | Navigate Kitchen Success Rate4 | 2 |