Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

GRAIN: Group Aggregation via Min-Norm Objective

About

Learning instability is a long-standing problem across machine learning, but it is especially acute in the overparameterized regime that defines modern deep learning: large models fine-tuned or trained on limited data traverse flat loss landscapes with many nearly-equivalent minima, and stochastic factors (initialization, data order, dropout, hardware non-determinism) can route optimization to very different solutions. The rise of large pretrained models (LPMs) makes the problem more urgent: training cost is high, downstream data is often small, and repeated runs for variance reduction are prohibitive. We introduce \textbf{GRAIN} (\textbf{G}roup \textbf{A}ggregation via m\textbf{IN}-norm objective), a lightweight training algorithm that replaces the mean aggregation used in mini-batch optimization (both across mini-batches and within a mini-batch) with a min-norm convex combination of group-wise gradients. \mName guarantees a non-negative inner product between the aggregated update and every group gradient, resolving intra- and inner-batch gradient conflict, and retains an $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$ convergence rate comparable to SGD. Under mild smoothness and absolute-continuity assumptions, the min-norm solution differs almost surely from the arithmetic mean, which yields a uniform-stability bound for \mName strictly tighter than the standard bound for SGD. Empirically across generation, classification, and regression at LPM scale, \mName delivers consistent improvements in mean performance and reductions in run-to-run variance over a broad suite of tasks, with no extra training-time or storage cost beyond a single backward pass.

Nghia Bui, Jiarui Yao, Lijing Wang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Text GenerationGSM8K
Accuracy85.53
63
Generative TaskPubMedQA labeled (0.8:0.2)
Accuracy76.58
28
Long-Tailed Image ClassificationCIFAR10-LT IF 50 (test)
Accuracy96.97
22
Sequence classification and regressionGLUE
RTE Accuracy82.59
14
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 LT-100 long-tailed (test)
Accuracy89.83
7
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 ST-100 step-imbalance (test)
Accuracy85.17
7
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10 ST-50 step-imbalance (test)
Accuracy97.56
7
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 LT-100 long-tailed (test)
Accuracy70.59
7
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 LT-50 long-tailed (test)
Accuracy88.87
7
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100 ST-100 step-imbalance (test)
Accuracy60.17
7
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update