Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Spectral Evolution-Guided Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models

About

Reducing visual token redundancy is critical for accelerating Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) without degrading cross-modal reasoning performance. Existing token pruning methods typically rely on single-layer signals, such as attention scores or token similarities, which overlook the cross-layer transformation of visual representations and may exhibit positional bias in multimodal token sequences. To address this limitation, we propose a training-free token pruning framework based on Cross-Layer Spectral Evolution (CLSE). Instead of measuring token importance from single-layer feature magnitudes, CLSE quantifies how token representations evolve across Transformer layers in the frequency domain. This evolution reflects the transition from high-frequency structural details to low-frequency semantic abstractions. We observe that tokens with stronger spectral redistribution across layers are more likely to be semantically active and should therefore be preserved. By modeling cross-layer token dynamics, CLSE provides a stable importance criterion that mitigates positional bias. Extensive experiments on both image and video benchmarks demonstrate that CLSE achieves a superior trade-off between efficiency and accuracy under aggressive token reduction. Across multiple MLLMs, CLSE reduces FLOPs, KV cache memory, and latency while maintaining competitive or improved performance.

Bin Chen, Yuxiang Cai, Yadan Luo, Yi Zhang, Jianwei Yin, Zhi Chen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA
Accuracy96.6
916
Multimodal EvaluationMME
Score2.34e+3
902
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench--
887
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQA)
Accuracy75
338
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench CN
Accuracy57.2
302
Object Hallucination EvaluationPOPE
Accuracy90.7
259
Visual Question AnsweringGQA
Accuracy61.5
218
Visual Question AnsweringVizWiz
Accuracy51
193
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
TextVQA Accuracy75.9
141
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench
Accuracy84.1
137
Showing 10 of 28 rows

Other info

Follow for update