Latent Visual States for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning
About
The integration of visual evidence has significantly enhanced the capabilities of large multimodal models. However, this integration predominantly relies on generating discrete outputs (etc., code or box coordinates) to invoke external tools, a process that introduces rigid dependencies and substantial latency. To overcome these limitations, we propose {EVA} (LatEnt Visual StAtes), a novel framework that natively generates continuous latent visual representations. These internal representations manifest as an adaptive sequence of Latent\_slot tokens, serving as intermediate visual thoughts during the reasoning process. These Latent\_slot tokens are then trained end-to-end with the discrete text tokens. This co-optimization, notably, causes extreme policy deviation in the 'transition window' following the Latent\_slot tokens. We develop D-GSPO (Decouple-GSPO) to target this root cause by decoupling the optimization of latent and discrete components. To support SFT, we construct EVA-230K, a high-quality text-image interleaved CoT dataset encompassing a diverse range of real-world scenes, documents, charts and OCR tasks. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks confirm that EVA achieves significant performance gains while enhancing inference efficiency.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Reasoning | Jigsaw | Accuracy66.7 | 44 | |
| Multimodal Understanding | MME-RealWorld-Lite | Overall Score49.8 | 38 | |
| Visual Reasoning | V* Attribute, Spatial, Overall | Overall Accuracy80.2 | 6 | |
| Multimodal Perception | HRbench 4K FSP FCP Overall | Overall Score73.7 | 5 | |
| Multimodal Perception | HRbench-8K FSP FCP Overall | Overall Score68.4 | 5 | |
| Multimodal Understanding | MME-Real Perception, Reasoning, Overall | Perception Score63.9 | 4 | |
| Vision-centric Reasoning | IQ (test) | Accuracy30 | 4 | |
| Vision-centric Reasoning | Relative Reflect | Accuracy39.6 | 4 |