Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Dual Distribution Estimation for Zero-shot Noisy Test-Time Adaptation with VLMs

About

While test-time adaptation (TTA) empowers vision-language models to adapt without costly retraining, it remains highly vulnerable to out-of-distribution (OOD) outliers prevalent in real-world applications. This discrepancy motivates Noisy TTA (NTTA), an online task to filter noisy OOD samples on the fly while maximizing in-distribution (ID) classification accuracy. Existing zero-shot NTTA approaches typically rely on test-time discriminative training, leading to overconfident misclassifications and significantly degraded inference efficiency. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework named Dual Distribution Estimation (DDE), shifting the zero-shot NTTA paradigm from instance-level learning to training-free Gaussian distribution modeling. DDE incorporates two novel modules: Positive Feature Distribution Estimation (PFDE) and Negative Label Distribution Estimation (NLDE). PFDE explicitly models class-wise inclusion and exclusion Gaussian distributions to formulate a calibrated contrastive score, robustly enhancing ID accuracy. In parallel, NLDE improves OOD identification by explicitly modeling the negative label distribution to mine highly discriminative labels, effectively mitigating spurious correlations. Extensive experiments show that on the large-scale ImageNet benchmark, DDE achieves an improvement of 3.70\% in harmonic mean accuracy and reduces the FPR95 for OOD detection by 6.20\%, while ensuring highly scalable and efficient online inference. Furthermore, DDE is zero-shot and training-free, demonstrating remarkable robustness in data-scarce scenarios. Codes are available at https://github.com/ZhuWenjie98/DDE.

Wenjie Zhu, Yabin Zhang, Liang Xu, Xin Jin, Wenjun Zeng, Lei Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Out-of-Distribution DetectionSUN OOD with ImageNet-1k In-distribution (test)
AUROC98.97
267
Out-of-Distribution DetectionImageNet (ID) vs iNaturalist OOD (test)
FPR@950.47
28
Out-of-Distribution DetectionImageNet (ID) vs Places (OOD) (test)
FPR@9514.42
28
Out-of-Distribution DetectionImageNet (ID) vs Textures (OOD) (test)
FPR@9520.85
28
OOD DetectionOpenOOD Near-OOD (ImageNet-1k ID)
AUROC84.52
15
Out-of-Distribution DetectionImageNet ID Average OOD (test)
AUROC97.89
9
Noisy Test-time AdaptationImageNet-1K
iNaturalist Acc_S67.72
8
Noisy Test-time AdaptationImageNet-S
Accuracy (iNaturalist, Severity S)43.23
8
Noisy Test-time AdaptationImageNet A
iNaturalist Accuracy (S)48.85
8
Noisy Test-time AdaptationImageNet V2
Accuracy (iNaturalist, S)59.84
8
Showing 10 of 24 rows

Other info

Follow for update