Teach-to-Reason: Competition-Guided Reasoning with a Self-Improving Teacher
About
Chest X-ray visual question answering (CXR VQA) requires models not only to predict correct answers, but also to produce reliable medical reasoning. However, existing reinforcement-learning-based training typically relies on answer-level rewards, which are often too coarse to improve chain-of-thought (CoT) quality and can become ineffective when group-level advantages collapse to zero. We propose \textbf{Teach-to-Reason (T2R)}, a framework that introduces comparison-based supervision into CoT optimization through a self-improving \emph{Teacher} and a competition-guided \emph{Reasoner}. As the Teacher is iteratively strengthened via self-competition, the Reasoner is optimized against progressively stronger Teacher-generated references. We further introduce a case-wise reward design that preserves the original reward-induced positive/negative partition when it is informative, and restores supervision from competition scores when the original reward signal degenerates. Experiments on multiple CXR open-ended VQA benchmarks show that T2R consistently outperforms strong baselines, indicating that comparison-based supervision, when integrated in a controlled and principled manner, provides a more effective training signal for reasoning optimization.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual Question Answering | VQA-RAD | -- | 67 | |
| Medical Visual Question Answering | MIMIC-CXR | Accuracy28.04 | 25 | |
| Open-Ended Visual Question Answering | Med-CXR | Accuracy31.73 | 14 | |
| Open-Ended Visual Question Answering | Covid19 | Accuracy49.43 | 14 | |
| Open-Ended Visual Question Answering | CXR-PA | Accuracy45.32 | 14 | |
| Open-Ended Visual Question Answering | Slake | Accuracy64.92 | 14 |