Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
About
Process reward models enable fine-grained, step-level evaluation of LLMs, yet building them for agentic settings remains prohibitively difficult: long-horizon interactions, irreversible actions, and stochastic environment feedback make both human annotation and Monte Carlo estimation infeasible at scale. In this work, we show that reinforcement learning (RL) post-training already provides the ingredients for effective step-level scoring, eliminating the need for dedicated reward model training altogether. Concretely, we derive an implicit advantage under a general stochastic Markov decision process, which we term progress advantage -- log-probability ratio between the RL-trained policy and its reference policy exactly recovers the optimal advantage function. This formulation makes the resulting signal annotation-free, domain-agnostic, and available as a byproduct of the standard RL post-training pipeline. We validate the effectiveness of the progress advantage across three different applications: test-time scaling, uncertainty quantification, and failure attribution on five benchmarks and four model families. Across all settings, it consistently outperforms confidence-based baselines and, despite requiring no task-specific training, surpasses dedicated trained reward models. We complement these results with deeper analyses on characteristics of progress advantage, offering practical guidance for adoption in real-world agentic systems.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive web-based shopping tasks | Webshop | Success Rate45 | 80 | |
| Uncertainty Quantification | τ2-bench Airline | AUROC86.5 | 32 | |
| Uncertainty Quantification | τ2-bench Retail | AUROC0.69 | 32 | |
| Conversational agents in customer-service environments | Tau2-Airline | Success Rate72 | 20 | |
| Tool-augmented general task solving | AgentDojo | Success Rate91.8 | 20 | |
| Multi-Turn Tool Calling | BFCL MT v4 | Success Rate42.5 | 20 |