Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Layer-Specific Prompt Fusion Discovery via Differentiable Search in Vision Foundation Models

About

Visual prompt tuning has emerged as a parameter-efficient fine-tuning approach for adapting large-scale Vision Transformers (ViTs) to downstream tasks. As its learnable prompts are applied in input and feature spaces, prior to jointly going through attention in transformer layers, the most commonly used scheme for fusing image and prompt tokens is concatenation or addition. In this paper, we aim to study a fundamental yet essential problem in visual prompt tuning: whether a single fusion scheme tends to yield better results, and whether that would be beneficial to develop a hybrid fusion scheme. To this end, we formulate the task as a bi-level optimization problem, and solve it leveraging differentiable architecture search. In this context, the learnable prompts and their fusion schemes are jointly optimized. To enrich the search space in the architecture search, we propose two additional fusion schemes, namely, affine transformation and cross-attention, in addition to concatenation and addition. Extensive experiments on 34 datasets spanning VTAB-1k, FGVC, and HTA show consistent gains over prompt-tuning baselines. With a frozen ViT backbone, our method delivers a favorable accuracy--latency--parameter trade-off compared with VPT-Deep and recent variants. Our findings reveal that how prompts fuse with image tokens plays a significant role in visual prompt tuning, and a hybrid fusion fashion can more effectively leverage layer semantics of ViTs, contributing a novel perspective for visual prompt-tuning research.

Xi Xiao, Xingjian Li, Yunbei Zhang, Cheng Han, Tianming Liu, Tianyang Wang, Runmin Jiang, Jihun Hamm, Xiao Wang, Min Xu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic segmentationADE20K
mIoU45
699
Image ClassificationVTAB 1K
Overall Mean Accuracy77.01
359
Instance SegmentationCOCO
APmask42.6
301
Image ClassificationVTAB 1k (test)
Accuracy (Natural)79.6
145
Visual Task AdaptationVTAB 1K--
95
Image ClassificationFGVC
Average Accuracy91.6
78
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update