Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Learning to Recover Task Experts from a Multi-Task Merged Model

About

Multi-task model merging aims to consolidate several task-specific experts into a unified model, yet static merging consistently suffers from parameter interference. While dynamic merging models aim to bridge this gap, many works rely on the costly storage and loading of redundant expert components at inference. In this work, from the perspective of task expert, we view parameter interference as parameter perturbation introduced to each expert during merging process. We show that such parameter perturbations can be modeled as affine transformation, which can be approximated as additive offsets. Motivated by these, we propose Recover Task eXpert (ReTeX), a framework that predicts those offsets, in order to undo parameter interference and recover task-expert performance from a single merged checkpoint. To recover the appropriate expert when task identity is unknown, we introduce a router-free task identifier based on SVD subspace signatures computed offline before inference. At inference, the identifier selects the task whose subspace yields the smallest projection residual for a given input. As a result, ReTeX recovers over 95% of individual-expert performance in both vision and NLP domains, while significantly improving generalization to unseen tasks. Crucially, we also show that the parameter offset prediction leads to emergent adaptive interpolation of expert knowledge for out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks. ReTeX adaptively interpolates seen expert knowledge to handle unseen tasks. Our code is available at https://github.com/BAIKLAB/ReTeX

Jinwook Jung, Taegyu Kim, Kumju Jo, Sungyong Baik• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCUB-200--
126
Coreference ResolutionWinoGrande
Accuracy95
72
Multi-task image classification8 vision tasks
Accuracy95.4
48
Multi-task image classification14 Vision Tasks
Accuracy93.5
48
Multi-task image classification20 vision tasks
Accuracy93.6
48
Paraphrase IdentificationPAWS
Accuracy96.1
35
Multi-task image classification8-task vision suite
Average Performance92.2
28
Multi-task image classification30 Vision Tasks
Accuracy91.2
12
Multi-task image classificationVision Tasks Suite 8 tasks ViT-B/32 (test)
Accuracy92.2
12
Multi-task image classificationVision Tasks Suite 14 tasks ViT-B/32 (test)
Accuracy89.8
12
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Follow for update