REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward Decomposition
About
Aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse user preferences is a critical yet challenging task. While post-training methods can adapt models to specific needs, they often require costly data curation and additional training. Test-time scaling (TTS) presents an efficient, training-free alternative, but its application has been largely limited to verifiable domains like mathematics and coding, where response correctness is easily judged. To extend TTS to preference alignment, we introduce a novel framework that models the task as a realignment problem, since the base model often fails to sufficiently align with the stated preference. Our key insight is to decompose the underlying reward function into two components: one related to the question and the other to preference information. This allows us to derive a REAlignment Reward (REAR) that selectively rescales the proportions of these two reward terms. We then show that REAR can be formulated as a linear combination of token-level policy log-probabilities, making it computationally efficient and easy to integrate with various TTS algorithms such as best-of-$N$ sampling and tree search. Experiments show that compared to other test-time baselines, REAR not only enables scalable test-time realignment for preference alignment tasks under diverse user requirements, but also generalizes to mathematical and visual tasks under appropriate preference settings.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hallucination Evaluation | MMHal-Bench | MMHal Score84.2 | 309 | |
| Context-specific Preference Alignment | Multifaceted Bench (test) | Score76.8 | 6 | |
| Preference Alignment | PrefEval Explicit Preference (test) | LLM-Evaluated Score77.7 | 6 | |
| Preference Alignment | PrefEval Implicit Choice (test) | Choice Accuracy78.6 | 6 | |
| Preference Alignment | PrefEval Implicit Preference (test) | Score19.1 | 6 | |
| Role-playing Preference Alignment | Ping-Pong Bench (test) | Score3.07 | 6 |