Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

REAR: Test-time Preference Realignment through Reward Decomposition

About

Aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse user preferences is a critical yet challenging task. While post-training methods can adapt models to specific needs, they often require costly data curation and additional training. Test-time scaling (TTS) presents an efficient, training-free alternative, but its application has been largely limited to verifiable domains like mathematics and coding, where response correctness is easily judged. To extend TTS to preference alignment, we introduce a novel framework that models the task as a realignment problem, since the base model often fails to sufficiently align with the stated preference. Our key insight is to decompose the underlying reward function into two components: one related to the question and the other to preference information. This allows us to derive a REAlignment Reward (REAR) that selectively rescales the proportions of these two reward terms. We then show that REAR can be formulated as a linear combination of token-level policy log-probabilities, making it computationally efficient and easy to integrate with various TTS algorithms such as best-of-$N$ sampling and tree search. Experiments show that compared to other test-time baselines, REAR not only enables scalable test-time realignment for preference alignment tasks under diverse user requirements, but also generalizes to mathematical and visual tasks under appropriate preference settings.

Fuxiang Zhang, Pengcheng Wang, Chenran Li, Yi-Chen Li, Yuxin Chen, Lang Feng, Chenfeng Xu, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Bo An• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Hallucination EvaluationMMHal-Bench
MMHal Score84.2
309
Context-specific Preference AlignmentMultifaceted Bench (test)
Score76.8
6
Preference AlignmentPrefEval Explicit Preference (test)
LLM-Evaluated Score77.7
6
Preference AlignmentPrefEval Implicit Choice (test)
Choice Accuracy78.6
6
Preference AlignmentPrefEval Implicit Preference (test)
Score19.1
6
Role-playing Preference AlignmentPing-Pong Bench (test)
Score3.07
6
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update