Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

DRIFT: Difficulty Routing Self-DIstillation with Rhythm-Gated Exploration and Success BuFfer Training

About

Enabling large language models to achieve stable self-improvement without external expert supervision remains a central challenge in complex reasoning tasks. Existing self-distillation and reinforcement learning methods lack explicit mechanisms for tracking problem-level learning progress and adapting optimization strategies accordingly. Consequently, training may over-optimize easy problems, receive weak supervision from hard problems, and fail to sufficiently explore borderline cases. To resolve these issues, we propose DRIFT, an online self-evolution policy optimization framework for large language models. DRIFT regulates the model's self-improvement process through the joint use of Difficulty Routing and Rhythm Gating. The former identifies the model's learning state at the problem level and dynamically allocates self-distillation and reinforcement learning signals, while the latter refines policy updates at the token level, concentrating exploration on critical reasoning positions. By further incorporating a success buffer and a two-stage curriculum learning strategy, DRIFT preserves high-quality historical experience while progressively guiding the model from reliable behavior acquisition toward stable policy evolution. Evaluated across five benchmarks and three model scales, DRIFT surpasses the peak performance of both GRPO and SDPO across all evaluated metrics. On the average score over the five benchmarks, DRIFT achieves 79.5$\%$, outperforming GRPO by 9.5$\%$ and SDPO by 7.5$\%$, establishing a new state-of-the-art result. Notably, on ToolUse, DRIFT reaches an accuracy of 79.2$\%$, improving over GRPO by 13.5$\%$ and SDPO by 10.7$\%$, setting a new state-of-the-art and substantially outperforming all concurrent methods.

Haisen Luo, Yiwei Liu, Haoning Wang, Dan Liu, Junxi Yin, Haotian Wang, Lei Zhang, Xiaoyu Tian, Shuaiting Chen, Yuansheng Song, Baoyan Guo, Xiongfei Yan, Bolan Yang, Chengwei Liu, Ming Cui, Jiong Chen• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Scientific ReasoningSciKnowEval Chemistry
mean@1694.3
27
Scientific ReasoningBiology
Avg@1674.4
24
ReasoningReasoning Benchmarks Biology, Chemistry, Material, Physics, Tool Use
Biology Accuracy64.3
11
Scientific ReasoningChemistry
Accuracy82
10
Scientific ReasoningMaterial
Accuracy81.4
10
Scientific ReasoningPhysics
Accuracy80.5
10
Tool UseTool use
Accuracy0.792
8
Scientific ReasoningSciKnowEval Biology (val)
Best@1680.1
3
Scientific ReasoningSciKnowEval Material (val)
Best@1687.9
3
Scientific ReasoningSciKnowEval Physics (val)
Best@1693.8
3
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update