DOPD: Dual On-policy Distillation
About
On-policy distillation (OPD) offers superior capacity transfer by supervising student-sampled trajectories with dense token-level signals. To furnish high-quality supervision sources and thereby elevate the performance frontier of distillation, an intuitive direction is to infuse privileged information to either teacher or student itself. However, this additional input induces a potential failure mode we dub privilege illusion: a pattern that conflates the transferable capability gap that students are meant to close, and the information asymmetry gap that can only be mimicked but never replicated. This issue is further amplified by the inherent non-uniformity of token-level supervision, where only a small subset of tokens carries pivotal capability-bearing signals. To this end, we propose DOPD, an advantage-aware dual distillation paradigm that dynamically routes token-level supervision between privileged teacher and privileged student policies based on their advantage gap and relative probabilities. Each token receives supervision of different strength, objective, and strategy from either teacher or student itself, which transfers credible capability while simultaneously receiving auxiliary signals, to alleviate privilege illusion. Extensive experiments on both large language model (LLM) and vision-language model (VLM) settings demonstrate that DOPD consistently outperforms Vanilla OPD and other counterparts. Further results on stability, robustness, continual learning, and out-of-distribution tasks validate its superiority.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Function Calling | BFCL V3 | -- | 104 | |
| Logical reasoning | ZebraLogic | Accuracy26.9 | 86 | |
| Logical reasoning | AutoLogi | Accuracy (Avg@8)71 | 32 | |
| Code Generation | LCB v5 | Score27.1 | 21 | |
| General Knowledge | C-Eval | Score71.3 | 18 | |
| General Visual Understanding | General Visual Benchmarks RealWorldQA, MMStar | RealWorldQA Score67.4 | 7 | |
| Multi-task Visual Language Evaluation | Aggregate Visual Performance | Average Performance58.4 | 7 | |
| Visual Reasoning | Visual Reasoning Benchmarks MathVision, DynaMath, LogicVista | MathVision Accuracy45.6 | 7 | |
| Visual Understanding | Visual Understanding Benchmarks MMMU, MMMU-Pro, VSI-Bench | MMMU Accuracy67 | 7 |