Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CoLT: Teaching Multi-Modal Models to Think with Chain of Latent Thoughts

About

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) to tackle complex visual reasoning tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning steps in natural language. However, this text-based reasoning paradigm is inherently slow at inference time with even thousands of tokens and fundamentally constrained by the expressiveness of natural language. In this paper, we propose CoLT, (Chain of Latent Thoughts), a novel framework that teaches multi-modal models to reason through a chain of latent thought representations instead of verbose text tokens, which can perform thinking with as few as 3 steps. Naively forcing the model to think with latent states easily produces meaningless semantics and makes training unstable. To effectively regulate the latent reasoning process, we introduce a lightweight external decoder that provides step-level supervision for each latent reasoning step in two complementary directions: a forward mode that decodes latent thoughts into the textual reasoning of the next step, and a backward mode that aligns decoder hidden states with the model's latent thoughts given preceding textual context. We further incorporate internal supervision that encourages coherent step-by-step latent transitions. The decoder and internal supervision are removed during inference to maintain high efficiency of latent reasoning. Extensive experiments on eight benchmarks demonstrate that CoLT not only outperforms existing latent reasoning methods such as CODI and SIM-CoT, but also surpasses latent visual reasoning approaches that rely on auxiliary images with costly annotation requirements. Compared to text CoT methods, CoLT can notably reduce the inference time by 10.1$\times$ and text decoding time by 22.6$\times$. Code is released at https://github.com/hulianyuyy/CoLT.

Lianyu Hu, Shengqian Qin, Zeqin Liao, Qing Guo, Liang Wan, Wei Feng, Yang Liu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Multimodal UnderstandingMMStar--
511
Diagram Question AnsweringAI2D
AI2D Accuracy85.4
509
Science Question AnsweringScienceQA (SQA)
Accuracy92.8
338
Chart Question AnsweringChartQA
Accuracy74.7
165
Multimodal UnderstandingMMBench
Accuracy84.6
137
Text-based Visual Question AnsweringTextVQA
Accuracy81.3
106
Multimodal ReasoningSEED-Bench
Accuracy77.5
59
Multimodal UnderstandingMMT
Accuracy67.4
19
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update