Learning to Select, Not Relearn: Hard-Routed Mixtures of Reasoning LoRAs
About
Composing independently trained LoRA adapters into a single large language model is useful for multi-domain adaptation, especially when the original training data cannot be shared. A common approach is to use MoE-style routing over LoRA experts, but for frozen pretrained adapters, soft weighted combinations can change the unit-scale additive update under which each LoRA module was originally trained. We propose \textbf{Hard-Routed MoR-LoRA}, a two-stage framework for composing frozen reasoning LoRA experts through unit-scale hard selection. First, domain-specific LoRA adapters are trained independently using reinforcement learning from verifiable feedback to obtain reasoning experts. Then, all experts are frozen, reasoning traces are distilled from them, and only a lightweight shared router together with a small attention LoRA is trained for integration. The router selects exactly one expert per token using hard top-1 routing, while a straight-through estimator enables gradient-based training. Experiments across five benchmarks, multiple model scales, and additional model families show that Hard-Routed MoR-LoRA preserves expert behavior while requiring substantially fewer trainable parameters than soft-routing mixture baselines. Our analysis further shows that normalized soft mixtures often concentrate most routing mass on a single expert, suggesting that hard unit-scale routing provides a simple and efficient abstraction for frozen LoRA expert composition.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentiment Classification | SST-2 | Accuracy90.71 | 220 | |
| Math Word Problem Solving | GSM8K | Accuracy84.69 | 117 | |
| Linguistic Acceptability | COLA | Accuracy (CoLA)78.09 | 108 | |
| Mathematical Reasoning | SVAMP | Accuracy (%)85.67 | 71 | |
| Boolean Question Answering | BoolQ | Accuracy84.43 | 56 | |
| Scientific Question Answering | ARC Challenge | Accuracy84.61 | 16 | |
| Multi-task Language Evaluation | GSM8K, ARC-C, MedQA, BoolQ, and CoLA Evaluation Average | Average Accuracy79.8 | 14 | |
| Multi-task Language Reasoning | Reasoning and Language Understanding Suite (GSM8K, ARC-C, MEDQA, BOOLQ, COLA) | GSM8K Accuracy90.67 | 6 |