Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

FRAME: Learning the Adaptation Domain with a Mixture of Fractional-Fourier Experts

About

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) reparameterizes weight updates in a fixed basis: low-rank adapters operate in the spatial domain, while a recent line of spectral methods operates in a fixed Fourier domain. We argue that the choice of domain is itself a design degree of freedom that should be learned, and that no single basis is optimal across tasks, layers, or tokens. We introduce Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts, a mixture-of-experts adapter in which every expert carries a learnable fractional-Fourier order that continuously interpolates between the spatial domain (recovering vanilla LoRA) and the Fourier domain (recovering a spectral adapter). Routing tokens through experts that occupy different points on this spatial-spectral continuum lets the model place each low-rank update in the domain where it is most compact, and -- because fractional-Fourier operators of different orders are mutually incoherent -- makes the experts naturally decorrelated, which reduces interference and improves multi-task composition. The order is a single scalar per expert, trained with a separate optimizer, and the transform is computed with an $\mathcal{O}(d\log d)$ chirp--FFT surrogate, so Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts adds negligible cost over standard MoE-LoRA. Across commonsense, mathematical, code, and knowledge benchmarks on LLaMA-3.1-8B and Qwen2.5-7B, Fractional-Fourier Mixture of Experts improves over strong MoE-LoRA and spectral baselines -- including FlyLoRA, FourierMoE, and HMoRA -- while keeping the active-parameter budget small, and analysis shows that the learned orders specialize by task and layer in interpretable ways.

Tom Saliencro, Maya Lindqvist, Rohan Desai, Priya Nair, Daniel Whitmore• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Mathematical ReasoningMAWPS
Accuracy87.4
279
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsense Reasoning (BoolQ, PIQA, SIQA, HellaS., WinoG., ARC-e, ARC-c, OBQA)
BoolQ Accuracy77.3
245
KnowledgeMMLU
Accuracy41.9
171
Mathematical ReasoningSVAMP
Accuracy (%)68.4
71
Mathematical ReasoningAQUA
Accuracy34.8
59
Mathematical ReasoningMATH
Accuracy21.4
55
Common Sense ReasoningCommon-sense Reasoning Average
Average Accuracy90.4
47
Commonsense ReasoningCommonsense Reasoning (test)
Overall Average Accuracy88.2
31
Showing 8 of 8 rows

Other info

Follow for update