Many Voices, One Reward: Multi-Role Rubric Generation for LLM Judging and Reward Modeling
About
Reliable reward and preference signals are critical for evaluating and optimizing large language models on open-ended tasks. Rubric-based judges offer a transparent way to decompose such judgments into explicit evaluation criteria, but existing annotation-free rubric generators typically rely on a single generic evaluator. As a result, they may overlook important dimensions of human preference, a failure mode we term dimensional blind spots. To address this limitation, we propose Multi-Role Rubric Generation (MRRG), a training-free and reference-free framework that elicits evaluation criteria from multiple complementary roles and consolidates them into an auditable rubric-based scorer. This scorer can be used both to validate pairwise preferences and to provide rewards for GRPO-style Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR). Experiments on preference validation benchmarks show that MRRG consistently outperforms single-role rubric generation baselines across multiple backbone models. Further RLVR experiments demonstrate that MRRG yields a stronger reward signal for improving open-ended generation.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preference Prediction | JudgeBench | Positional Consistent Accuracy74.8 | 30 | |
| Preference Validation | RewardBench 2 | Accuracy74.5 | 20 | |
| Preference Validation | PPE | Accuracy57.8 | 20 | |
| Post-RL Evaluation | BiGGen-Bench | Accuracy63.7 | 5 | |
| Post-RL Evaluation | HealthBench Hard | Accuracy32.1 | 5 |