When Does Resolution Help a Frozen Backbone? Global Attention at Resolution Predicts Scalable Adaptation for Camouflaged and Marine Animal Segmentation
About
Adapting frozen vision foundation models to fine-grained segmentation now largely depends on backbone selection. Whether the backbone applies global attention to a high-resolution token set predicts whether a low-rank adapter turns resolution into accuracy. Isotropic ViTs attend globally over the full grid and keep improving with resolution; hierarchical backbones confine early attention to local windows and pool the grid before their global stages, plateauing at lower resolutions. A controlled six-backbone study establishes the pattern, and editing the backbone points to the cause: pooling keeps the benefit, removing global attention does not. The effect is specific to low-rank adaptation. Under one fixed pipeline, SALT (Side-stem, Attention-gated U-Net, Low-rank Tuning), one RGB-only pass on a strong isotropic backbone wins the best S-measure on the four data-matched camouflaged sets, and leads every marine and salient set. It reaches a new state of the art on both marine-animal benchmarks (MAS3K mIoU 0.878).
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salient Object Detection | HKU-IS 4,447 images (test) | MAE0.017 | 69 | |
| Marine Animal Segmentation | MAS3K (test) | mIoU0.878 | 57 | |
| Camouflaged Object Detection | COD10K 2026 | S-measure (Sm)0.932 | 38 | |
| Salient Object Detection | DUTS 5019 (test) | Mean Absolute Error (MAE)0.016 | 37 | |
| Salient Object Detection | ECSSD 1000 | MAE0.015 | 29 | |
| Salient Object Detection | PASCAL-S 850 | MAE0.039 | 29 | |
| Marine Animal Segmentation | RMAS 500 (test) | mIoU78.6 | 10 | |
| Salient Object Detection | DUT-OMRON 5168 | S-measure (Sm)90.5 | 8 | |
| Camouflaged Object Detection | NC4K 4121 | Sm93.4 | 6 |