Occluding the Solution Space: Planner-Agnostic Adversarial Attacks on Tolerance-Aware Manipulation
About
Adversarial attacks on motion planning are crucial for evaluating and quantifying the intrinsic robustness of robotic manipulation. However, existing approaches are typically limited by restrictive exact-pose objectives and their reliance on planner-in-the-loop queries. To address these limitations, we propose a planner-agnostic attack framework for tolerance-aware manipulation. Our approach shifts the evaluation paradigm to task-level feasibility over goal regions, efficiently inserting adversarial obstacles without requiring oracle access to the victim system. Offline, we characterize the robot's intrinsic workspace capabilities via a kinematic occupancy heatmap, which encodes the density of feasible trajectories and robustness priors without invoking a specific planner. Online, we formulate the attack as a budgeted maximum-coverage optimization, strategically deploying obstacles subject to explicit geometric constraints to occlude the solution space. Extensive experiments across simulation and real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method reliably induces planning failures, significantly outperforming planner-in-the-loop baselines in both computational efficiency and attack efficacy.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 1 Obstacle | PSR80.6 | 22 | |
| Adversarial Obstacle Placement | Scene-1 | Min Budget (80% PSR)1 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Obstacle Placement | Scene 3 | Min Budget (80% PSR)1 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Obstacle Placement | Scene-2 | Min Budget (80% PSR)1 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 2 (1 Obstacle) | PSR74.6 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 2 3 Obstacles | Path Success Rate (PSR)60.8 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 3 Obstacles | Path Success Rate (PSR)65 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 1 3 Obstacles | Path Success Rate (PSR)38.6 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 2 5 Obstacles | Path Success Rate (PSR)0.00e+0 | 11 | |
| Adversarial Attack on Motion Planning | Scene 3 1 Obstacle | Path Success Rate (PSR)83.2 | 11 |