Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition Probability
About
Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge. While LLMs are trained to write like humans, we hypothesize that this training leaves an indelible mark. LLMs develop a particularly strong aversion to token repetition very early in training. This bias persists as a ''Vestigial Heuristic'' (a developmental artifact) that is activated in LLM-generated text, separating LLM from human writing. To probe this phenomenon, we introduce Telescope Perplexity, a metric that evaluates the token repetition of the model, $P(s_i | s_{1:i})$ . Our empirical investigation reveals that the Telescope Perplexity signature emerges early in pre-training, and Telescope Perplexity empirically enables highly effective zero-shot LLM detection. We show state-of-the-art or competitive performance across diverse datasets (including modern evaluation sets we introduce), reference models, and perturbation schemes with greater efficiency than other methods.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM-generated content detection | GB Essay ChatGPT | F1 Score94.317 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated content detection | GB Creative ChatGPT | F1 Score96.255 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated content detection | GB Essay GPT4o | F1 Score93.922 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated content detection | GB Creative GPT4o | F1 Score96.269 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated content detection | GB Creative Claude | F1 Score89.028 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated text detection | Detect LLM Text (test) | AUROC99.219 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated text detection | AI vs Human (test) | AUROC95.143 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated text detection | HC3 Plus (test) | AUROC0.9845 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated text detection | ESL GPT4o Mini (test) | AUROC0.9998 | 5 | |
| LLM-generated text detection | GB Creative ChatGPT (test) | AUROC0.994 | 5 |