Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Telescope: Improving Zero Shot Detection of LLM Generated Content By Measuring Token Repetition Probability

About

Distinguishing Large Language Model (LLM) generated text from human writing is a critical and difficult challenge. While LLMs are trained to write like humans, we hypothesize that this training leaves an indelible mark. LLMs develop a particularly strong aversion to token repetition very early in training. This bias persists as a ''Vestigial Heuristic'' (a developmental artifact) that is activated in LLM-generated text, separating LLM from human writing. To probe this phenomenon, we introduce Telescope Perplexity, a metric that evaluates the token repetition of the model, $P(s_i | s_{1:i})$ . Our empirical investigation reveals that the Telescope Perplexity signature emerges early in pre-training, and Telescope Perplexity empirically enables highly effective zero-shot LLM detection. We show state-of-the-art or competitive performance across diverse datasets (including modern evaluation sets we introduce), reference models, and perturbation schemes with greater efficiency than other methods.

Christopher Nassif, Josh F. Cooper• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
LLM-generated content detectionGB Essay ChatGPT
F1 Score94.317
5
LLM-generated content detectionGB Creative ChatGPT
F1 Score96.255
5
LLM-generated content detectionGB Essay GPT4o
F1 Score93.922
5
LLM-generated content detectionGB Creative GPT4o
F1 Score96.269
5
LLM-generated content detectionGB Creative Claude
F1 Score89.028
5
LLM-generated text detectionDetect LLM Text (test)
AUROC99.219
5
LLM-generated text detectionAI vs Human (test)
AUROC95.143
5
LLM-generated text detectionHC3 Plus (test)
AUROC0.9845
5
LLM-generated text detectionESL GPT4o Mini (test)
AUROC0.9998
5
LLM-generated text detectionGB Creative ChatGPT (test)
AUROC0.994
5
Showing 10 of 25 rows

Other info

Follow for update