Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Real-Time LiDAR Gaussian Splatting SLAM

About

We present a real-time LiDAR-based framework for Gaussian Splatting SLAM that tightly couples fast G-ICP registration with spherical rasterization-based dense mapping for large-scale sequences. Leveraging LiDAR geometry rather than appearance, we reuse tracking-estimated local covariances to initialize Gaussians with range-aware scales and to derive surface normals for geometry-aware map optimization. We further introduce a covariance-derived geometry score that measures local complexity and drives pruning in planar regions and selective densification in structurally rich areas, while optimized Gaussians and LiDAR-specific confidence cues are fed back to improve tracking robustness. On the Newer College dataset, our method achieves an F-score of 86.78\% using purely online trajectories at real-time speed ($>$20 FPS), and additional experiments on other datasets confirm its stability and scalability.

Seungjun Tak, Yewon Jeon, Jaeik Hwang, SukMin Hwang, Seongbo Ha, Hyeonwoo Yu• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Camera TrackingKITTI
Average ATE RMSE0.338
19
Trajectory EstimationKITTI Sequence 00
ATE (m)1.08
11
Trajectory EstimationKITTI Sequence 08
RMSE T-ATE (m)2.9
8
LiDAR MappingNewer College Math Institute
Accuracy14.43
6
LiDAR MappingOxford Spires Observatory
Accuracy14.48
6
LiDAR MappingOxford Spires Keble College
Accuracy12.71
6
LiDAR MappingNewer College (Quad)
Acc7.62
6
Trajectory trackingNewer College (Quad)
ATE RMSE (m)0.08
5
Trajectory trackingOxford Spires (keb)
ATE RMSE (m)0.177
5
Trajectory trackingOxford Spires (obs)
ATE RMSE (m)0.336
5
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update