Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

InternVLA-A1.5: Unifying Understanding, Latent Foresight, and Action for Compositional Generalization

About

Unified models for robot manipulation aim to equip one policy with both the semantic priors of pretrained VLMs and the physical dynamics learned through future prediction. In practice, existing designs tend to erode the semantics of the pretrained backbone, suffer interference among heterogeneous objectives, and learn future prediction from scratch in pixel space, leaving the dynamics priors of pretrained video generators unexploited. We present InternVLA-A1.5, which builds the policy on a native VLM backbone that keeps training on VQA and subtask prediction, and attaches a lightweight unified expert for continuous action generation. Future prediction is recast as a latent-querying problem, where a small set of learnable foresight tokens condenses the task-relevant future into a compact latent code under the supervision of a frozen pretrained video generation model, so the policy inherits world-model dynamics priors without ever learning pixel-level generation. The video branch is discarded at inference, keeping real-time control. Pretrained on 1.2M robot episodes and 3M multimodal samples, InternVLA-A1.5 achieves the best overall results on all six simulation benchmarks. In the real world, the preserved semantics deliver the strongest compositional generalization on held-out instruction bindings, and the two designs together sustain long-horizon execution.

Haoxiang Ma, Junhao Cai, Xiaoxu Xu, Hao Li, Yuyin Yang, Yang Tian, Jiafei Cao, Hongrui Zhu, Zherui Qiu, Zhaxizhuoma, Yuqiang Yang, Jiaqi Peng, Xueyuan Wei, Yangkun Zhu, Jiahao Jiang, Xing Gao, Hanqing Wang, Feng Yuan, Kailin Li, Xueyue Zhu, Tai Wang, Yan Ding, Jiangmiao Pang, Jia Zeng, Jingjing Zhang, Bowen Zhou, Yao Mu, Chunhua Shen, Weinan Zhang• 2026

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Robotic ManipulationLIBERO-Plus
Language Understanding Score86.9
414
Robot ManipulationLIBERO
Spatial Success Rate98.6
58
Robot ManipulationSimplerEnv WidowX Visual Matching
Average Success Rate80.8
52
Dynamic ManipulationDomino
Success Rate (SR)29.3
20
Bimanual Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin Clean
Success Rate93.3
18
Bimanual Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin (Random)
Success Rate93
18
Bimanual ManipulationRoboTwin
Average Success Rate93.2
14
Mobile ManipulationEBench (val-train)
Success Rate (SR)43.1
6
Mobile ManipulationEBench Unseen (val)
Success Rate32.8
6
Mobile ManipulationEBench (test)
Success Rate (SR)35.2
6
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

GitHub

Follow for update