Adversarial Defense on CIFAR-10 (test)
93.62Standard Accuracy
Wang et al. (2022) + SSNI-L
Updated 7d ago
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2025.06 | 93.62 | 79.95 | - | - | - | - | |
2025.06 | 93.49 | 88.41 | - | - | - | - | |
2025.06 | 92.97 | 80.08 | - | - | - | - | |
2025.06 | 92.45 | 79.88 | - | - | - | - | |
2025.06 | 90.1 | 88.4 | - | - | - | - | |
2025.06 | 89.71 | 81.9 | - | - | - | - | |
2026.05 | 89.66 | - | 23.82 | 66.94 | 25.75 | 19.63 | |
2026.05 | 87.74 | - | 22.81 | 63.46 | 22.73 | 17.82 | |
2026.05 | 87.58 | - | 25.91 | 65.53 | 25 | 20.52 | |
2026.05 | 86.68 | - | 18.19 | 63.5 | 57.57 | 18.19 | |
2026.05 | 85.74 | - | 43.68 | 60.84 | 6 | 6 | |
2026.05 | 85.1 | - | 28.52 | 64.09 | 27.75 | 22.85 | |
2026.05 | 84.81 | - | 38.58 | 67.24 | 50.9 | 37.83 | |
2026.05 | 84.08 | - | 17.1 | 59.15 | 53.05 | 17.1 | |
2026.05 | 84.08 | - | 16.98 | 59.34 | 53.2 | 16.98 | |
2026.05 | 82.48 | - | 23.31 | 58.92 | 24.11 | 18.66 | |
2026.05 | 82.37 | - | 41.73 | 57.17 | 5.8 | 5.79 | |
2026.05 | 81.22 | - | 35.77 | 64.16 | 48 | 35.07 | |
2026.05 | 80.74 | - | 24.58 | 58.84 | 25.42 | 19.97 | |
2026.05 | 79.36 | - | 19.09 | 54.36 | 49.68 | 19.09 | |
2026.05 | 79.21 | - | 40.84 | 64.86 | 52.15 | 40.37 | |
2026.05 | 78.6 | - | 45.81 | 58.2 | 8.05 | 8.05 | |
2026.05 | 78.04 | - | 43.86 | 58.58 | 10.16 | 10.16 | |
2026.05 | 77.48 | - | 39.67 | 63.08 | 51.03 | 39.27 | |
2026.05 | 76.3 | - | 23.63 | 57.75 | 51.71 | 23.63 | |
2026.05 | 71.5 | - | 21.83 | 54.64 | 49.62 | 21.83 | |
2026.05 | 69.98 | - | 32.78 | 55.36 | 43.76 | 32.38 | |
2026.05 | 69.22 | - | 38.63 | 48.96 | 7.87 | 7.87 | |
2026.05 | 66.26 | - | 36.83 | 55.19 | 45.59 | 36.53 | |
2026.05 | 65.18 | - | 39.64 | 47.76 | 10.07 | 10.07 |