Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (epsilon=8/255, test)
95Clean Accuracy
Song et al.
Updated 1mo ago
Evaluation Results
| Method | Links | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026.01 | 95 | - | - | - | 9 | - | - | |
2026.01 | 94 | - | - | - | 15 | - | - | |
2026.01 | 92.22 | - | - | - | - | 69.97 | 66.56 | |
2026.01 | 91.1 | - | - | - | - | 68.66 | 65.87 | |
2026.01 | 88.75 | - | - | - | - | 69.03 | 66.1 | |
2026.01 | 88.62 | - | - | - | - | 64.95 | 61.04 | |
2026.01 | 88.54 | - | - | - | - | 65.93 | 62.76 | |
2026.01 | 87.51 | - | - | - | - | 66.01 | 63.38 | |
2026.01 | 84.12 | - | - | - | 54.9 | - | - | |
2023.05 | - | 58.63 | 69.25 | 70.63 | - | - | - | |
2023.05 | - | 54.05 | 62.8 | 64.44 | - | - | - | |
2023.05 | - | 50.74 | 56.63 | 59.49 | - | - | - | |
2023.05 | - | 39.15 | 41.33 | 44.22 | - | - | - | |
2023.05 | - | 41.59 | 43.01 | 45.55 | - | - | - |