Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Warehouse

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF)warehouse 161x63
Success Rate100
31
Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning (LTL Instruction Following)Warehouse Finite Horizon
Success Rate99
30
Multi-Agent Path FindingMedium Warehouse 25x25 world size, 34.6% static obstacle rate
Success Rate100
20
Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning (LTL Instruction Following)Warehouse Infinite Horizon
Average Visits880.6
20
Target Assignment and Pathfinding (TAPF)warehouse 10-20-10-2-1
Success Rate100
14
Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningWarehouse Small (11x20)
Mean Performance (N=2)5.97
6
Offline Multi-agent Reinforcement LearningWarehouse Tiny (11x11)
Mean Performance (N=2)11.15
6
Interval QualityWarehouse
Hit Rate50.2
5
Feasibility PredictionWarehouse
F1@142
5
Task PerformanceWarehouse
Turns Taken12
5
Exploration efficiencyWarehouse Mini
CE2.66
5
Exploration efficiencySmall Warehouse
CE1.08
5
WarehouseWarehouse H3
Mean Episode Reward268.9
5
WarehouseWarehouse H2
Mean Episode Reward269.7
5
WarehouseWarehouse H1
Mean Episode Reward270.8
5
WarehouseWarehouse H0
Mean Episode Reward269.5
5
Autonomous ExplorationWarehouse 1260m3
Exploration Duration41.42
5
Short-term NavigationWarehouse 2.5D
Average Prompts2.86
5
Mobile ManipulationWarehouse Cross-room transfer v1
AIKF14.3
5
Robotic ExplorationWarehouse Gazebo simulation (test)
Distance (m)86,942
5
Autonomous Robotic ExplorationWarehouse Gazebo simulation (environment)
Exploration Distance (m)869
5
Multi-agent coordinationWarehouse (uneven) size S
Success Rate100
5
Multi-agent coordinationWarehouse (even) size S
Success Rate1
5
Multi-agent coordinationWarehouse (WH)
Base Score473.65
4
Autonomous ExplorationMini warehouse Simulated
Success Rate100
4
Showing 25 of 32 rows