Gazebo Simulation
Benchmarks
| Task Name | Dataset Name | SOTA Result | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autonomous Navigation | Gazebo simulation 50 dynamic and static obstacles | Success Rate (%)100 | 13 | |
| Off-road Navigation | Gazebo Simulation Hill World Environment (test) | Average Collisions0.2 | 3 | |
| UAV Path Planning | Gazebo Simulation Overall | Success Rate88.3 | 3 | |
| UAV Path Planning | Gazebo Simulation Forest environment | Success Rate76.7 | 3 | |
| UAV Path Planning | Gazebo Simulation Garage environment | Success Rate96.7 | 3 | |
| UAV Path Planning | Gazebo Simulation Office environment | Success Rate96.7 | 3 | |
| Trajectory tracking | Gazebo Simulation Low feedback noise 80 dB | Hypotrochoid Tracking Error (m)0.0075 | 3 | |
| Agile Transport | Gazebo Simulation Agile Transport | Positional Error (m)0.2982 | 2 | |
| Trajectory tracking | Gazebo Simulation High feedback noise 40 dB | Hypotrochoid Tracking Error (m)0.012 | 2 |
Showing 9 of 9 rows