Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

RoboTwin

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0
Average Success Rate94.4
100
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 1.0
Success Rate100
48
Robot ManipulationRoboTwin Clean 2.0
Average Success Rate93.82
39
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin (random-scene)
Success Rate100
36
Robot ManipulationRoboTwin Randomized 2.0
Overall Success Rate96.1
33
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0 (test)
Average Success Rate94.3
30
Dual-arm ManipulationRoboTwin Long & Extra Long Horizon Tasks 280-650 Steps 2.0
Handover Block62.9
20
Dual-arm ManipulationRoboTwin Medium Horizon Tasks 150-230 Steps 2.0
Move Can Pot63.4
20
Dual-arm ManipulationRoboTwin Short Horizon Tasks 100-130 Steps 2.0
Lift Pot Success Rate67.4
20
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin Easy 2.0
Adjust Bottle Success Rate99
19
Bimanual ManipulationRoboTwin Hard setting 2.0 (test)
Beat Block Hammer SR37
15
Bimanual Robot ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0
Success Rate: Handover Block87
14
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 50-task (Seen Tasks)
Clean Success Rate95.8
14
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin Hard 2.0
Beat Block Hammer Success Rate93
14
Robot manipulationRoboTwin Easy 2.0
Average Success Rate90.48
14
Robotic manipulationRoboTwin Hard 2.0
Success Rate87.2
13
Robot ManipulationRoboTwin
Success Rate86.9
13
Bimanual Robot ManipulationRoboTwin easy setting 2.0
Average Success Rate93
13
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin
Success Rate80.7
13
Robot manipulationRoboTwin Hard 2.0
Average Success Rate89.28
13
Progress EstimationRoboTwin
MRA31.84
12
Robot ManipulationRoboTwin
Success Rate (Independent Control)65
11
Bimanual robotic manipulationRoboTwin Hard (domain-randomized)
Average Success Rate1,170
11
Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin Easy
Average Success Rate (AVG)89.51
10
Bimanual Robotic ManipulationRoboTwin 2.0
Average Success Rate64.2
10
Showing 25 of 157 rows